In May, Atkinson, of Lake County, Calif., pleaded no contest to incest, oral copulation, lewd contact with a minor and distribution of lewd material to a minor, the newspaper reports.
But in a letter to the court, Atkinson said she doesn't consider what she did as incest.
|Dat ass - this is a picture of what her son, indeed, would hit . . .|
Sure, I know what you're thinking - where did she come up with the 50% . . .?
Okay, maybe not. Perhaps it is more in line with, WTF, LADY, THIS WASN'T A CASE OF MISTAKEN IDENTITY, YOU KNEW IT WAS YOUR SON AND IN A CIVILIZED SOCIETY, THIS SORT OF THING IS, YOU KNOW, "FROWNED UPON" AND GENERALLY FOUND TO BE CREEPY AS HELL!
A couple of points here:
A child molester is not simply Jerry Sandusky. It is also people like Mistie Atkinson here. Yeah, people like to joke about there is no teenage boy who is going to complain about the "molestation" when it is an older woman. But stop thinking child abuse is only when it is a homosexual affair, or a girl with an older man.
Using "disorders" to excuse behavior opens a Pandora's box. As if a criminal can claim special protection as a "handicapped" person because of their "illness." Sociopaths also have disorders. But we feel a lot better having guys like Ted Bundy off the streets. We are supposed to rise above our limitations, and not simply give in and plead for sympathy.