In an hour-long speech, the heir to the throne argued that man's destruction of the world was contrary to the scriptures of all religions - but particularly those of Islam.Snail darts . . . good. Jews and Christians . . . myeh, not so good.
He said the current 'division' between man and nature had been caused not just by industrialisation, but also by our attitude to the environment - which goes against the grain of 'sacred traditions'
He added: 'The inconvenient truth is that we share this planet with the rest of creation for a very good reason - and that is, we cannot exist on our own without the intricately balanced web of life around us.
'Islam has always taught this and to ignore that lesson is to default on our contract with creation.'
If I were a devout Anglican, I might just worry about this fellow succeeding his mother to become head of the Church of England, which when I last checked was a Christian institute. Of course, one might point out to this inbred tool that should he read Genesis - here, for his convenience I will remind him it is the first book of the Old Testament, so it is really easy to find - the same lesson is reflected in Scripture there.
5 comments:
He's claimed to have said that when he eventually assumes the throne, he won't consider himself "defender of the faith", but as "defender of ALL faiths".
That should make Tom Cruise happy, ya think?
What to do with him?
Well, in fairness, he was addressing the Islamic Studies center at Oxford, not making a general address. I'm not much of a fan of His Highness in general, but I think this is just audience analysis.
Charles, you ignorant slut.
(slaps her forehead with her hand)
Dumb. Really dumb. (shakes head in not-really-disappointment-but-almost)
Post a Comment