Saturday, March 31, 2007

Civil War Soldier

I had the occasion today to attend my first historical reenactment.

My husband's aunt, Anna Schurmann, and her husband and son - Bill and Robert Schurmann, respectively - are all soldiers in the 2nd Cavalry Regiment (U.S.), fighting for the North. This weekend saw a reenactment at a nearby regional park, so I took my 6-year-old son to view the troops.

I took this picture and decided that since it does not show any "modern" items in the background, I would try to turn it into something "antique" looking. I failed to note the fellow's name, but it is one of the cavalry troops in camp, resting between skirmishes. For those Photoshop nerds, I used a high pass filter with soft overlay and then applied an action to transform it into a tintype, which would have been the type of photography back then.

April 1st - Join the Group

Just a reminder for anyone who may find themselves in the vicinity of Santa Ana, CA:


Tomorrow is Palm Sunday and St. Joseph Church will be having its annual "Blessing of the Streets" at 4:00 p.m. Started back during a time when the local neighborhood was reknowned for its violence, it is a Eucharistic procession for about a one mile loop around the French Park/Logan neighborhoods. The English and Spanish choirs alternate singing hymns and four stops are made at altars along the way to pray and worship the True Presence.

As stated, it starts at 4:00 p.m. in the church with prayers and songs, and ends there with the same. Has it worked? Well, the neighborhood is worlds safer now. In any event, it is a good way to kick off Holy Week.

Hope to see you there.

Tuesday, March 27, 2007

Big Mamma is Watching

In today's morning read, I saw this article on a woman who successfully sued the local children services agency.

A civil jury has awarded $4.9 million to a Seal Beach woman who claimed that the Orange County Department of Social Services violated her parental rights by taking her two pre-teen daughters away in 2000 and placing them in foster care.

Lawyers for Deanna Fogarty-Hardwick contended that two social workers fabricated negative evidence and suppressed positive evidence to support their decision to remove the girls, who were then 6 and 9.

The jury in Superior Court Judge Ronald Bauer's courtroom voted 10-2 that Fogarty-Hardwick's right to raise her children free of governmental interference had been violated, said Shawn A. McMillan, one of her attorneys.
I do not know all of the facts in this case and I would invite anyone who does to comment on them here. However, I will say that in my line of work as a family law attorney, then agencies like these get involved in cases, it becomes a scary dilemma for lawyers. Do you advise your client to cooperate? Or are you doing them wrong by not advising them to exercise their 5th Amendment right against self-incrimination, since these things can wind up in dependency court?

As with many states, California has - by statute - mandated reporters. These are persons who by their occupation come into contact with children and must report any reasonable suspicions of child abuse or neglect. By virtue of being a mandated reporter, they are immune from civil liability in a suit filed by an angry parent. I know that when I have a client complain that they think the other parent is "abusing" the child, I have to walk a fine line in hearing them outright and haering them in the context of a custody dispute, where I know people's emotions cloud reality and their better judgment, at times. For many mandated reporters, that distinction is overlooked at the report is filed, setting off what can turn into a firestorm. Reading this article does not assuage my worries when I have to deal with this.

At the Park Sunday

Taken at Morrison Park in Santa Ana, CA
(c) 2007

Lady Justice

Monday, March 26, 2007

Picture this . . .

I found a great blog spot featuring a combo of two of my favorite subjects - Catholicism and photography. Check out The Catholic Photographer - some good stuff!

Sweet Adeliiiiiiiiiiiiine!

Happy Anniversary, St. Joseph Church!

I must be getting old, when I find myself on St. Patrick's Day at church, enjoying a concert put on by my church to kick off our official anniversary year, but I would not have been anyweher else - the congregation of St. Joseph of Santa Ana, CA has been around 120 years and we're still kicking!

In addition to the concert (which was simply great), we also had a parish picnic the next day and a triligual Mass (English, Spanish and Samoan) on March 19th, St. Joseph's Day.

Here is a shot of the "barbershop quartet" that performed at our concert, taken by yours truly. This particular act was enjoyed by all since the two older gentlemen have been singing in barbershop quartet competitions for years and had the perhaps unenviable task of teaching the two younger fellows - our parish priests - how to sing. Our parochial vicar surprised a lot of people - singing lead, he proved to have a great voice!
From left to right: Bob; Fr. Mike; Nick; Fr. John

Saturday, March 24, 2007

Celebrity

In looking over the headlines on the news sites I visit, I have to ask myself - do I care that Britney Spears is out of rehab? Or that Zsa Zsa's husband has handed over his DNA? Or that I can have Paul McCartney's music plus a $4 latte at Starbucks?

I cannot embed this video, but if you want a very, very funny take on the Cult of Celebrity, please visit http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dSi-wDqQ60g and watch this video by my favorite country singer, Brad Paisley. I just watched it and gotta share it.

Friday, March 23, 2007

Abuse of Civic Process

While navigating the 22 Freeway this afternoon, I was listening to a segment on this story about one of the Los Angeles councilmen and his use of his office to go after the Hilton Hotel near LAX.

Escalating Los Angeles' battle for a living wage ordinance for hotels near Los Angeles International Airport, City Council President Eric Garcetti has urged potential visitors to boycott the LAX Hilton because of ongoing labor problems.

In a seven-paragraph letter addressed to "hotel patrons" and obtained Thursday by the Los Angeles Daily News, Garcetti details workers' calls for a boycott amid labor disputes and urges visitors to book at other locations in the city away from the LAX area.

This amazed me. When is it permissible for an elected official - in his capacity as such - launch a campaign against a private business?
"This is a labor dispute, and the government should not be sending out letters like this," Englander said. "The last time I looked, the convention and tourism business brings in a lot of money to the city. I don't see how it is responsible for a city official to get involved like this."
The issue is not that the hotel is discriminating against workers. Eric Garcetti is mad at the group of hotels along Century Boulevard by the airport for not paying what he considers to be a "living wage." That is, a wage people like Garcetti hold should be arbitrarily set so as to allow a worker such a janitor a chance to pursue the American dream.
The LAX Hilton is one of a dozen hotels in the area that is in court with the city about a proposed living wage ordinance. Under the ordinance, 13 hotels along the Century Boulevard corridor would be required to increase workers' pay to $9.39 an hour with health insurance, or $10.64 an hour without health benefits.
I have a problem when politicians try to regulate the marketplace by what they think is "moral" without considering the relationship of their proposals to reality or the impact it would have on the local economy. It makes no sense to set an arbitrary wage for a janitor above what the market would pay for such labor. The idea is noble - but why do a dozen hotels have to foot the bill for the councilman's largesse?

Father What-a-Waste

Dymphna doesn't like this term:
This phrase has irritated me for years. When a woman refers to a priest that way she's saying that the only men who should serve God are the ones who are uglier than a fatherlesss billy goat and/or so socially inept that no woman would want them.
Well, no. I have often heard this term but mostly in a sort of back-handed compliment to a fellow who happens to be blessed by God to wear a Roman collar and have some nice features. Actually, the features are a secondary part, since I have also heard this term to describe a priest who - in the opinion of the ladies - would have made a fine husband and father, and let me tell you, good looks are not as important as you think as to what makes a man attractive to a woman. But that is a sacrifice he has made for Mother Church - and, in a way, a sacrifice we women make by respecting him for that decision.

Interestingly, one priest who was at a parish to which I once belonged spokeof his Roman collar being a "chick magnet," in that he would encounter rather forward women - women who were quite frank about their feelings that if he would just give them the chance, they could show him what he has been "missing." I suppose those are the same who cannot respect the "no pest strip", i.e., wedding band, on the left hand of a man they find attractive.

But that does not mean we ladies cannot appreciate an attractive man, be he priest, firemen, judge, carpenter, Mark Harmon, or a UPS deliveryman. Or, in my case, my dearest Husband, who gets both my love and appreciation . . .


Okay, not a picture of my husband but both have that
thick 'ole thatch of silver on top that is just delicious!

Thursday, March 22, 2007

"It's a Religion Thing . . ."

I heard this story on the radio while driving to court this morning. Domestic violence prevails but there is no need to worry . . . because sharia allows it.

In Germany, under normal circumstances, one must wait a year after separation from spouse before a divorce can be granted. However, when the facts warrant, an expedited divorce may be granted.

A 26-year-old Moroccan immigrant living in Germany, as well as her attorney, thought she had such facts - her Moroccan husband inflicted domestic violence and threatened to kill her. Sounds reasonable, no?

No, not according to the judge in the matter:
"The judge rejected the application for a speedy divorce by referring to a passage in the Koran that some have controversially interpreted to mean that a husband can beat his wife. It's a supposed right which is the subject of intense debate among Muslim scholars and clerics alike. 'e exercise of the right to castigate does not fulfill the hardship criteria as defined by Paragraph 1565 (of German federal law),' the daily Frankfurter Rundschau quoted the judge's letter as saying. It must be taken into account, the judge argued, that both man and wife have Moroccan backgrounds."
I am sorry, but what does German law say about the issue? This is another example of "embracing multiculteralism" and "respecting ethnic values" run amok. I would hope that no jurisdiction in the United States of America would consider something as asinine as this.

Wednesday, March 21, 2007

Got Latin?

Fr. Martin over at Bonfire of the Vanities is soliciting input, asking for people to report where Latin is being used at their respective churches.

If you know of a parish (i.e., it's either your parish, or you go there regularly) that is using any Latin on a regular basis, or using any Gregorian chant, please post here. (I'd ask that this not be a place for folks to post opinions pro and con.) I ask that you identify the parish by name, city and diocese. If you can provide a link to a webpage or something else with more information, even better!

Oh, just to be clear--nothing against the classic, "Tridentine" Roman rite, but I'm not talking about that, either; that has to be in Latin. I mean celebrations of parish Masses (i.e., not private/special occasion Masses) according to the current, Vatican II rite of the Mass, And if that is being done with any--or even, all--in Latin, by all means, include that.
He has asked people to link on over, so pop bye if you have something to contribute. Please note he is looking for simply information - it is not meant to be a place to post your opinion of the Latin Tridentine Mass vs. Novus Ordo, the Catholic Bishops, glass pitchers or goblets on the altar, liturgical abuses, Samoan leis, Barney costumes, etc. The facts, ma'am, just the facts . . .

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

Tennessee Wants to Talk With Me

Let me tell you how careful Tennessee is . . . as part of the application process to allow someone to practice law in that state, a potential candidate has to have a personal interview with an attorney before they are accepted. I received a letter from an attorney in Knoxville and today his secretary confirmed that said interview has to be face-to-face.

Okey-doke, then, looks like next week I'll give this fellow a call after he gets back from his vacation in France and set sumthin' up. Hopefully, he'll understand when I say, "Look, you're a busy lawyer, and I'm a busy lawyer, so how 'bout we do this on a Saturday and I'll buy you dinner at The Downtown Grill, whaddaya say?"

(Now, I don't know if that is where Knoxville attorneys hang out, but it is on Gay Street and it serves alcohol, so I figger it has to be the gathering spot for them lawyer types . . )

Dave Oatney, if the timing is right, want to meet up for dinner, where you and your missus can be my guest? If I have to come to Knoxville on a boondoggle, well, heck, I might as well have some good times as well.

Oh, Suuuuure . . . It's Not His Fault . . .

I read that a town official in Belle Meade, TN responded to critics of Al Gore's energy-guzzling Monster House. It seems he really, really wanted to install roof top solar panels but, gosh darn it, it turns out that even the Messiah of the Ecosphere could not overcome CC&R's.

Terry Franklin, Belle Meade's building officer, said the town only allows power generating equipment to be placed on the ground level. "Solar panels are generators," Franklin said. "We told them they couldn't do it," he said. "They wanted to try anyway, but we convinced them it was something the board wouldn't allow."

So what's a Savior of the Earth supposed to do? Sure, he could have installed ground generators, but it would have disturbed the landscaping. C'mon, people, have a heart . . .

Thanks . . . um . . . whoever

I came home today to find a copy of Red County in my mailbox, addressed to me. Red County bills itself as a magazine promoting "Business, Lifestyle, Politics . . . From the Center-Right."

Red County is geared to Orange County (California) centrist Republicans. I am not sure I fit that label, however, with certain issues. Not to be called a one trick pony, the cover guy was Rudy Giuliani. Now, as a native New Yorker, I admire Rudy for what he did for the city and his leadership during the dark days of 9-11. Yeah, yeah, I was living in the O.C. when that occurred but anyone who grew up in NYC and still had family and friends were affected by that day. However, there is that sticky issue of abortion . . . and Rudy is pro-choice. Everyone has a breaing point and that is my Farenheit 415 - I will not let the unborn down and vote for a pro-choice candidate.

Anyhow, I will look through this magazine, especially the article on the aftermath of Kelo v. City of City of New London. And the article about diversity in the Republican party.

That's me . . . GOP and proud.

Friday, March 16, 2007

Letter to an Aborted Child

I do not know whether this letter writer is a real person or whether it is a work of fiction. However, it gives one pause and I would like to think that every woman who has had an abortion has - at least - given thought to, "What if . . .?"

A Letter to the Child We've Chosen Not to Have

Thursday, March 15, 2007

Musings

I heard yesterday about a company called Exhale that offers post-abortion e-cards. When you care enough to send the very best . . . but not enough to save a life.

Will someone please make sure Sanjaya Malakar leaves "American Idol" before my husband drives up to Los Angeles and physically removes him? After watching him perform on Tuesday, the only explanation I can offer is that all those customer service representatives that were outsourced to India are votin' on the job.

Today the family and I have to vacate our house while the downstairs floors are refinished. A couple of days in a hotel will excite the kids, at least. Saturday morning, I'm sleeping in and calling room service.

Time for coffee . . .

Sunday, March 11, 2007

Forgotten Heroes

Pray for the soul of Jonathan Schulze. In January 2007, in went down to the basement of his home, wrapped an electrical cord around a beam, and hung himself. Jonathan was only 25 years old. And he was a United States Marine.

"[Jonathan] had told his parents that 16 men in his unit had died in two days of battle in Ramadi. At home, he was drinking hard to stave off the nightmares. Though he managed to get a job as a roofer, he was suffering flashbacks and panic attacks so intense that he couldn't concentrate on his work. Sometimes, he heard in his mind the haunting chants of the muezzin—the Muslim call to prayer that he'd heard many times in Iraq. Again and again, he'd relive the moments he was in a Humvee, manning the machine gun, but helpless to save his fellow Marines. "
On March 2nd, I was in the Nashville airport to catch a flight home. I went over to the magazine rack for some reading material and stopped, feeling a chill run up my spine. On the cover of Newsweek was a picture of 21-year-old Marissa Strock. Sitting in a chair with her Army t-shirt and a pair of shorts on, she gazed at the camera, with what was left of her legs crossed in front of her. Marissa is a double amputee, courtesy of an IED in Iraq. My God, I thought, when I was her age, I was in the Army. A difference of a couple of decades and that could have been me. I bought the magazine, read it on the flight home, and got mad.

I urge everyone to read the Newsweek article about what has become a national tragedy, the neglect that we as a country are showing our veterans. We have all heard by now of the scnadal regarding Walter Reed Hospital and the conditions of some of the wards there, but that is only a small item.

This is not a stand about whether we should be in the war or not. The point is, is that once we have fellow Americans committing themselves to sacrifice for the sake of democracy and freeedom, for the sake of what they believe is a noble mission (let us not forget that our men and women over there are adult volunteers and I grit my teeth when I hear a politician bloviate about our kids in Iraq), then they deserve more than a yellow ribbon stuck on the back of someone's Range Riover driving through suburbia. Consider this point:
"Already, the war has made it harder for the military to recruit new soldiers and more expensive to retain the ones it has. If we fall down in the attention we provide them, who's to say volunteers will continue coming forward?"
But the volunteers will come because, frankly, that is part of the American spirit or drive, if you will. And for that reason, we need to pay attention now to the problems that the Veterans Administration are facing. Notwithstanding the problems at Walter Reed, the fact is that the VA is overloaded and underfinanced.
"Daniel Cooper, the VA's under secretary for benefits, confirmed his department was coping with a backlog of 400,000 applications and appeals; 75 percent of them were still within a "reasonable" reviewing time frame, he says. Yet, most of those claims were filed by veterans of previous wars (a veteran can file or appeal a claim even decades after discharge). As more servicemen and women return from Iraq, the backlog is likely to increase."
Why the problem? I've got good news for you, and I've got bad news . . .
"In Vietnam and Korea, about three Americans were wounded for every one who died. The ratio in WWII was nearly 2-1. In Iraq, 16 soldiers are wounded or get sick for every one who dies. The yawning ratio marks progress: better body armor and helmets are shielding more soldiers from fatal wounds. And advanced emergency care is keeping more of the wounded alive. The VA's Kussman says that soldiers who survive the first few minutes after an explosion have a 98 percent chance of surviving altogether. But that means an increased burden on the VA's health-care system."
What can be done? That is what I am trying to figure out, because my time and money is not unlimited and I worry about a charitable bureacracy using more of my resources that what can be given to the veterans. I am planning a move to Tennessee this summer, so before I look at whether I can arrange my schedule to volunteer at a VA hospital, I first need to get settled there. However, until that time, there can be donations, but I also want to be able to help, perhaps with sending letters or cards to wounded troops. I have found some resources and will be checking them out - I implore anyone who might know of a charity to please let me know:

As a personal thought, I cannot help but think that now more than ever, there is a need for women to step up to help, because so many of the wounded are female troops. Perhaps to some this may sound trivial, but I could see volunteers needed to help a woman who, say, has lost an arm, style her hair and put on some make-up for visits. A lot of us ladies do not like looking like Haggis McBaggis and something as simple as that could lift someone's spirits immensely. When my father volunteered at his local VA hospital with male quadripelegics, he would tell me that something as simple as helping them shave made them feel human again.

The need for our charitable resources can be overwhelming - Darfur refugees, pro-life missions, feeding the poor, etc. I guess the easiest thing for us Catholics to do is to pick one and support it. Think about it: we are over 1 billion strong worldwide and even if 1 out of every 10 Catholics found a mission and dedicated his or her resources to it - wow!

I really want to look into this further and I hope you will take the time to at least read the Newsweek article to get a sense of what our veterans are having to endure.

If all you can do is to pray for them . . . do that.

Friday, March 09, 2007

Have You Had Your Fish Today?

Today I indulged, if I may use that word, in one of my most beloved Lenten traditions. Arriving back from court, the MVP (Most Valuable Paralegal) reminded me that McDonald's is having their annual sale on Fridays of Filet-o-Fish sandwiches - $1.29 each! We drove forthwith and acquired the golden gems of goodness, nestled in their sweet little cardboard boxes.



Who can resist a deal like that? Sure, some of you foodies may protest, "Steph, what about a nicely crusted wild salmon filet, served over a bed of arugula with a balsamic reduction and a bed of hand-picked wild rice?" To which I say, "Feh." How can you even compare that against the flaky crust, the oozing tartar sauce, and the slice of radiantly orange cheese.

Folks, just like you cannot approach Easter without Lenten sacrifice and a hot cross bun (with the icky jellied fruit bits picked out), so too with the Filet-o-Fish sandwich.

The inventor of the Filet-o-Fish, Lou Groen, owned a McDonald's franchise in Ohio. He noticed a decline in sales on Fridays due to the fact that his neighborhood was heavily Catholic. Groen developed a fish sandwich that he took to Ray Kroc. Kroc had already planned to sell what he called a "Hula Burger", which was naught but a slice of pineapple on a hamburger bun - blecchhh. Kroc and Groen agreed to put both on the menu and keep the one that sold the most . . . and the rest is history.

So if you happen to spy someone enjoying this culinary creation, remind them to thank a Catholic.

Killing the Lizard

Hat tip to Dymphna.

Diogenes has a very well written article on Fr. Robert Bussen of Salt Lake City and his "special" Mass for homosexuals. I think the article can be read with a wider spectrum of thought, that is, it is not merely the sin of homosexual gratification that is the odious reptile, but other sins as well. Recently, my former pastor spoke of confronting sin and recognizing it for what it is, then doing the opposite. It is an easy instruction, but not an easy task, and we are called to master and oversome the sin in our lives, not to be subjugated by it.

However, that does require that first step - recognizing it as sin. And here is where Fr. Bussen fails. I find it disturbing to read this view towards his homosexuality:

"My bishop gave me the supportive counsel," he writes. "I was right in claiming, embracing and cherishing this dimension of my life. ... This holy fire is sacred, not secret. It must not be trashed by anyone."

Holy fire? I usually try not to jump too far in my logic but if homosexuality is seen as "sacred", what then would be problematic about sharing it with others . . . such as NAMBLA advocates?

Homosexual behavior is a disorder in the eyes of God. As is promiscuity in hetereosexual relationships. Or adultery. Or pornography. If one has any inclination towards sinful behavior, that lizard must be killed.

Reminds Us All of a Few People We Know


Sunday, March 04, 2007

Actual Holga Simulation


After a week away from the blog, whilst enjoying the pleasures of Knoxville, I arrive home only to realize that I clicked on the wrong action in Photoshop to simulate a picture taken with a Holga camera.
Well, I still like the picture I posted below, but here is the same shot done with the actual Holga simulator. Which I also like.